increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. to what extent do you agree or disagree? what other measures do you think might be effective?
Nowadays, by distribution of modern life, growing traffic and pollution in cities are the most prominent and significant challenges for people. There are several appropriate plans to control and decreasing detrimental effects of these phenomena and one of them is increasing the price of petrol. Several considerable debates about this solution have been happened during recent years.
Some environmentalists and traffic experts are unanimous in profitable consequences of increasing car fuel price. They believe that by this method, many of people prefer to use public transportation system instead of their cars and it causes to decreasing traffic and pollution especially in large and crowded cities. Recent published reports after last increasing petrol`s cost in U.S. illustrated that more than two third of people were reluctant to use their cars in that time. Additionally, by this method, according to comprehensive researches the pollution rate fell sharply and its indicators improved considerably. Most environmental experts claim that without preventive actions in this argument, we will have many reasonable issues and problems because of air pollution in next 30 years undoubtedly.
On the other hand, some social scientists argue that first of all and before any increasing in petrol`s price, governments should facilitate people`s transportation with distributing public transportation system. They emphasize that without expanding fundamental requirements for this problem, people will be under economic pressure with increasing the price of fuels. In their opinion, this decision`s effects are temporary and it make people unsatisfied and uneasy. These experts insist that in development countries the importance of public transportation systems is undeniable and all countries should pursue this pattern for avoiding disadvantages of traffic and pollution. According to recent investigations, European countries allocate more than 5% of their annual budget to expanding their public transportation like metro, buses and something like them.
In conclusion, continuing this rate of fuel consumption in industrial and transportation systems is very perilous for people on the future. I believe that governments, people and organizations should devise some suitable plans to avoid these terrible results of this phenomenon. In my idea, the importance of distributing public transportation systems for solving this problem is more than other solutions definitely.
Comments
Please inform me about my
Please inform me about my reasonable mistakes in this writing. i think my score can be more in this essay writing.
I didn't see the content for
1. I didn't see the content for 'what other measures do you think might be effective?'
2. you need use more unique words, look:
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.561755894193 98% => OK, but it is less than average.
3. you may not repeat those transition phrases, like:
In their opinion,...
They believe that...
I believe that...
In my idea,...
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...ion's effects are temporary and it make people unsatisfied and uneasy. These ex...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, third, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2144.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95555555556 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31511689085 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9577461434 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103354341135 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398921604694 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337274184449 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704328332607 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303344231641 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.58 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.