It has been said that the world is becoming a global village in which there are no boundaries to trade and communication. Do the benefits of globalization outweigh the drawbacks?
It is widely seen that there are fewer boundaries between countries due to globalization. In my opinion, this phenomenon could bring about much more merits for citizens compared to its negative influences, such as company’s movement to cheaper labor force and a low-level of salary or working conditions.
Admittedly, there are several demerits people should not ignore. Firstly, some companies move from developed countries to countries which suffer from poverty, simply because the labor force is cheaper. As a result, the rate of unemployment in developed countries witnesses a drammatical increase, while there are lots of job opportunities which are created in some developing countries with crowded inhabitants. Nowadays, for instance, whereas unemployment rate is going up in the US, it is declining in China which has cheaper human resources. Secondly, employee could face a low-level of salary and working condition. Moreover, they could receive a decent salary or work in satisfying conditions, unless they had well-trained skills or were master in their fields.
Nevertheless, despite the drawbacks mentioned above, I believe that globalization might bring about far more advantages for national economies. The principal perk is that goods might be sold widely all over the world without any difficulties. In other words, the products could be traded with other companies providing that they are in multi-national enterprises. For example, Kanye West, best known for his Grammy-winning rap albums, partnered with Adidas to develop a high-end footwear line called Yeezy. It is traded with Kanye’s fan worldwide and displayed in Adidas’s outlets in different countries. Another benefit is that globalization encourages investment in less developed countries. It might support or enrich national economy as well as citizens’ standard of living.
In conclusion, trading products globally and enhancing national economy far outweigh any minor demerits that could result from worldwide integration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ls or were master in their fields. Nevertheless, despite the drawbacks ment...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78333333333 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15499427716 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623333333333 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6112056125 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4375 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114920947397 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376882816834 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456961540644 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0724786140603 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472656582122 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.