Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
When the world is changing everyday, people tend to care about their present living, their plan, and future, this is the reason why most of modern people think that historical facts have no value to them. In my opinion, this should not be the thinking because we all know that so many fields can not have what they are achieving today without historical data support, such as technology and archaeology.
Firstly, technology is pumping the whole world’s economy into a phase, which is called the 4.0 industry era. This is where the information can be transmitted around the world within one second. One typical example about this is that 5G becomes one of the most important factor for this evolution, the question is what makes the 5G reality? Of course, the answer is 3G and 4G, this is the gradual development from time to time and historical data plays a critical role in this bloom.
Secondly, archaeology shows more connection from past to current value, because archaeology can only be a science when there was an associated historical event. This is true that all the artifacts remaining for today’s researches are collected from somewhere in this planet according to a historical event. Those artifacts are not only valuable in term of cost, it also a mean of academic research, which is supporting for education and understanding to our ancestors. Hence, our class will not have any conclusion if we do not have learning from those past events.
In conclusion, history plays an extremely important role to modern development, it is vital to any progressive growth. Especially, this is more reflected from technology and archaeology perspectives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
When the world is changing everyday, people tend to care about their presen...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, of course, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09818181818 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84405948956 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574545454545 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9924316018 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.833333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140290088724 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498518537047 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403437064573 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0781395182378 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363868237677 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.