Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Some people insist that learning about the past is worthless for living in the present. My point of view is the opposite. This essay will explain why learning in terms of the past is vital for us.
First of all, learning the past is the same as the process of getting inspiration. For example, the museum of history has abundant data about how archaeologists and scientists had discovered new knowledge in the past. It gives also precious opportunity to imagine how people in the past lived. Likewise, some students who are dreaming of being an artist can learn skills or get inspiration from artworks and collection books. They can imagine how legendary artists developed their gift or how they put lots of effort into their life at museums.
Furthermore, as much as we know about world history, we can see more how every country is linked respectively. The world where we live has gone through so many war times. For example, some countries had been colonized by other countries for a long time and it still affects the political relationship among countries. Because of the impact of war, some countries, for instance, North Korea and South Korea are still divided with two which was one country previously.
In conclusion, the past is the mirror of the present. Without knowing the history, people can't reflect themselves well. Above all, by learning the history, we could gain wisdom about how my ancestors had overcome crises or how they had coped with hard times in the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 90, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nt. Without knowing the history, people cant reflect themselves well. Above all, by ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, likewise, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86614173228 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57209277269 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610236220472 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2176779979 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9333333333 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178995449607 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679980560966 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647151676556 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122140253142 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664404659641 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.