Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Nowadays, in the industry 4.0 era, people have been concerning about technology and finance. It is believed that historical knowledge had been unvalued for our modern life. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this point.
It is understandable why knowledge about history had been devalued. The key rationale in favor of this view is that many people do not know the importance of history in the life of human being. The next reason is teaching methods of history in the school curriculum. A huge number of students think this subject is tedious and the lecture is really bland. However, history has an essential role to play in several fields, namely architecture, technology, and education. For instance, we inherited much knowledge from our forefather and improve it, such as in our recent life, smartphones are developed from mobile phones. In addition, I ensure that if students try to focus on history subject, they will realize that history is really interesting and really useful for themselves.
Moreover, history also plays a vital role in the finance field of each country. Tourists always have a natural curiosity, thus, they are eager to explore new things. Therefore, if a country has a long and interesting history, it means that there is a substantial number of historical monuments and ancient building in their country. China perfectly exemplifies this situation. Every year, a dramatic number of tourists is attracted by Chinese history and synonymous structure such as the Great Wall, so they receive huge profit from tourism field. Therefore, it is a big mistake if historical knowledge is diminished.
In conclusion, historical knowledge is the backbone thing in each country because it affects many fields such as architecture, technology, education, and especially tourist.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...s, in the industry 4.0 era, people have been concerning about technology and finance. It is bel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29166666667 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91248874051 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586805555556 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5351472823 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6470588235 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0904330554766 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0286240216192 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297358366109 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0536408979417 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334585422329 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.