More and more companies allow their employees to work from home or “remotely” rather than going into an office each day.
Do the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages?
In current times, it has become more and more common that companies had allowed their employees to work from home or a remote location, rather than going into an office each and every day of the week. This aspect, although looks promising carries with it some pitfalls.
There are several advantages that comes with this policy. Usually, when it comes to the job that allows working from home, there is a minimum requirement of infrastructure to accomodate the requirements of that job. Considering that most people have their work driven by data, all they need is a laptop and a good internet connection in order to do their job properly. This would also mean that the company would need less dedicated infrastructure in offices, thereby working as a cost-cutting measure.
If you look at it from the employees's perspective, it is also benificial for them in many ways. Firstly, the employee is spending less time and resources in their commute to the office. Then, there is a sense of ease in their mind when they are working from home. They can do their work while enjoying the leisures of staying at home. And not only that, when employee choose to work from home, it can also act as a way to rejuvinate their mind from their daily peril for work.
As said earlier, there are some cons that comes with pros of this policy. Usaully a person decides to work fromm home due to their laziness to go to work. This in turn could lead to less engagement in their work than the usual. Also, there is a less likely chance for employers to keep in check their employees as the contact is mostly virtual.
Even though there are some disadvantages of this policy, due to the current advancements in technology, these loopholes are being filled making work from home almost similar to that of working in the office. And hence, the advantages still outweigh the disadvantages by a considerable margin.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, look, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75226586103 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57866267494 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519637462236 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5844021159 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5294117647 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4705882353 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58823529412 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456568627272 0.244688304435 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131548462144 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124223810248 0.0667982634062 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254181411316 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133985325132 0.056905535591 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.