Most of the world's problems could be solved by international cooperation. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
The globalization has conquering almost every corners of the known world, reversing the misconception of being divided. Human race is living in a flourish era which resulted in an utopian scenario that international collaboration could be the answer for almost the global issues we are are forced to deal with. Swimming against the tide, I believe the true power of global cooperation is being exaggerated, and there are large numbers of critical problems could not be tackled by international collaboration alone.
On the one hand, global collaboration serves not only the pure purpose of facilitating the world’s development but also the interests of flourish countries. In fact, the major of us have been misled by a misconception that all the nation could achieve a common benefit by working in partnership, and that the developed countries are willing to cut down their interests for facilitating the poor country on the road of innovation. In detail, a group of great nations could conspire to gain the soft power over the indebted nations. For instance, ODA aid has been labeled as the fasted source of support for developing countries to fuel a breakthrough in national economy. However, tied with such the official development aid is always a series of privileges lurking somewhere in many areas. In retrospect, it is no doubt that China had conspired to monopolize a new Silk Road connecting the Indochina and a large area of southeast sea. Hidden behind the guise of global collaboration in reducing poverty, China had delivered the “unclear” aid to Cambodia and Laos, then utilized the local corruption to turn two countries into debtor. At a result, two over three nations of Indochina region have to pass series of policy in favor of China in territorial issue. It is one of thousands of prime examples to prove the dark side of international cooperation.
On another aspect, international collaboration could damage the traditional values. Globalization is the sweet fruit of working in partnership on global scale. It is labeled as an inevitable result when a country desires to join a general market to sell its own products. Globalization demands each nation to leave their traditional values behind in various levels to accept a general standard of living, sometimes called American standard. When the conflicts between the old and the new come to its peak, violence, terrorism, and the collapse of humanity are inevitable. For example, international cooperation was considered the main reason of terrorism, In retrospect, the combination of a global collaboration without its long-running speculation and an extreme religious society triggered the first domino in what proved to be the Holy War. In fact, after the Cold War, the major of Middle East nations had sent their graduates to the West for studying as well as had facilitated series of global projects to be activated in their lands. Unfortunately, their students, armed with the modern technology of the West, had been poisoned by the seed of religious misconception and became the leaders of Islamic Organizations afterwards. Besides, the conflicts between the West bosses and the local workers due to the cultural differences had finally burned the dream of peace and flourish in this regions into ashes. The scholars believe that the September 11 Attack is an inevitable result of the erroneous policies in global collaboration between Muslim Countries and the West. It is more urgent than ever to pay attention on foreign affairs to avoid repeating the historic flaws.
In conclusion, human race should have a comprehensive understanding in global issues, especially in international cooperation. I do believe that it is supposed to have various solutions to handle different problems instead of only depending on the international cooperation blindly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-22 | stephen | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | stephen | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | underscores | 67 | view |
| 2018-11-05 | Inpu Nguyen | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-05 | Inpu Nguyen | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?“Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past” 70
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 73
- To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?“Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past” 89
- Some people believe that we cannot learn anything from the past for our life today, while others believe that history is a valuable source of information to understand human's life. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 93
- Some people feel that it is always wrong to keep animals in captivity, for instance in zoos. Other people say that there are benefits for the animals and for humans. Discuss both sides of this debate, and give your personal view. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ing in a flourish era which resulted in an utopian scenario that international col...
^^
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: are
... answer for almost the global issues we are are forced to deal with. Swimming against t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1392, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...rned the dream of peace and flourish in this regions into ashes. The scholars believ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, however, if, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 103.0 41.998997996 245% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 26.0 8.3376753507 312% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3251.0 1615.20841683 201% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 614.0 315.596192385 195% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29478827362 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.977853291 4.20363070211 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16707913429 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 317.0 176.041082164 180% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516286644951 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1030.5 506.74238477 203% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4482108532 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.04 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.56 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144464573279 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407112986763 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471542962797 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107915930675 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492300029581 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 169.0 78.4519038076 215% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.