Nowadays families move to different countries for work. Some people think it has a negative effect on children, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Moving to another country for employment is a widespread phenomenon for families in the contemporary world. It is often argued that this is annihilation for our progeny, though others may disagree. I strongly confide that predisposition from homeland to other countries has an adverse impact on offspring. This essay will assert this statement with relevant examples.
Undoubtedly, changing territory has multifarious advantages, which gets the opportunity to affiliate with a new culture. Moreover, issues can gather diverse knowledge about languages and education by transcending their boundaries. For instance, one of my five years old cousins went England with her parents from Bangladesh for her father’s job, she learned a new language as well as several technics of pedagogy, when she came back after four years. Hence, it has pivotal merits to breed for making their future properly.
However, migration from own territory for the betterment of the family has some inconvenience for generation, which get them far away from their culture also their kin. In addition, in the double culture, they feel a dilemma to decide what is indispensable for them. To illustrate, in 1974, who’s shifted to America from various countries for immigrant purpose, the effect of their progeny was profound. Consequently, migration from own realm to another, even it is work purpose, is detrimental to breed.
In conclusion, the inclination of migration from one country to another for service is a general affair nowadays all over the world, which has an intense effect on our progeny. In one way, it gives a new insight into toddler and adolescent, in another way it creates some dilemma inside their mind. I strongly believe that the amenities outweigh their drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39068100358 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97218426718 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637992831541 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2334232844 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.266666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177861472975 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580522577147 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499054383752 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107729858046 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476904860212 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.