In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this.

Essay topics:

In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.

Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this.

Modern world is beginning challenges in our day to day fife. Likewise, education system is under continuous evolution. It is a general hypothesis that youth should spent few years after schools in working before opting then higher studies. Before keeping this view, one need to rationalized merits and demerits of this working break independently and critically.

To begin with, sharpening practical skills is for most beneficial impact of doing jobs after completion of higher school. No matters where the student is doing in native country or abroad. Infact, exposure of different county may pronounce the benefit as every market has its own values which are need to learn while working in it. By virtue of these experiences approach of candidates towards real world can be enlightened and making them fruitful for university courses. For instance, In Germany, students with job experiences are usually given previllage for their admissions in high studies are it is normal understanding that their skills and apptitudes are far more better then the one whole is fresh candidate. In other words, one can say that, by doing practical experiences students can define and pursue their goals with more passion and spirit.

To move on to disadvantages, breakage in career can have devastating impact. By motivating students towards jobs, youth are becoming more making money minded as money can appeal anyone easily. As a matter of fact, majority of youth quit their studies and become deeply indulge in making money, For example, it is a general observation, youngsters who start working at younger ages avoid higher studies as they completely lose the worth of education. In other words, deviation from normal education path can make younger generation completely unaware of value of university education and make them inclined in earning money.

To conclude, I pen draw by writing that having working experience prior to admission in university can improvise working skills of youth on one hand while it can make them far from education on 0ther hand. So a balance should be mantained for ultimate benefit that out weighs loss.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 668, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...hat their skills and apptitudes are far more better then the one whole is fresh candidate. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 673, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'better than'?
Suggestion: better than
...heir skills and apptitudes are far more better then the one whole is fresh candidate. In ot...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 680, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...ills and apptitudes are far more better then the one whole is fresh candidate. In ot...
^^^^
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ultimate benefit that out weighs loss.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, may, so, then, while, for example, for instance, as a matter of fact, in other words, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2361516035 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70509320741 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588921282799 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8552616213 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.25 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147373004912 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471099732285 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370854798122 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878698461144 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272599772242 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.