Some people believe that if a police force carries guns, this encourages higher level of violence in that society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Security is one of the leading concerns of countries in every corner of the world where governments establish their own security laws to protect their regions and ensure social order. In fact, it is stated that police, whose main obligation is saving countries and citizens from harms, should not be allowed to hold guns because it might result in the rise of violent rate. Personally, I strongly believe that carrying guns is necessary because of two main reasons: the importance of guns in supporting police to keep the peace in regions and to ensure a better and safer life for citizens.
Firstly, no one can deny the significance of using guns to support police doing their jobs, especially in keeping the peace for their countries. More specific, using guns help thems protect themselves and others from terrorism because the police equipped guns can better control situations. Take the police who are charged with destroying drugs trafficking is an example, they, evidently, have to be allowed to use guns because of their dangerous missions and threatening enemies. Therefore, they need to carry guns to protect themselves, complete their assignments and lessen any responsible risks. A similar situation can be easily found in terror attacks, especially in war zones like Pakistan, Yemen or Syria. In these areas, equipping guns for police is mandatory because the police can not fight against attackers without using weapons. Needless to say, although in many cases, the police might not need to use guns, it is obvious that guns play a very important role if necessary.
Lastly, a better and safer life can result from the reduction of crime in society. In fact, police need to take advantages of weapons like guns to make people obey the laws and to prevent and solve the crime. Specifically, in lots of cases, it is easier for the police to arrest someone who is a dangerous offender with a gun and as the result, the crime rate can be controlled strictly. For instance, it might be easy to arrest a robber without using guns, however, it can become extremely dangerous if he/she holding something that can harm innocent others. Therefore, police need to use powerful tools like guns in order to control these threatening people. Furthermore, in many situations, there are lots of offenders trying to kill or harm police who resort criminal into the prison sentence. That’s the reason why guns can also be considered as a self-defence weapons which help police protect themselves and others. When the crimes are controlled, people’s lives, sooner or later, will become safer, better and happier.
In a nutshell, using weapons like guns of the police will obviously play a very important role in keeping the peace for a country, reducing the crime rate in society as well as making a better, safer and happier life for people if they are used legally, properly and efficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 989, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lay a very important role if necessary. Lastly, a better and safer life can resu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in fact, as well as, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2421.0 1615.20841683 150% => OK
No of words: 483.0 315.596192385 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01242236025 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64535677377 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486542443064 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 768.6 506.74238477 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.5600422687 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.421052632 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4210526316 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0836867142996 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032717196371 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.01866020857 0.0667982634062 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0535206012058 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185735897732 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.