Some people believe that if a police force carries guns, this encourages higher level of violence in that society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
To maintain harmony in the society we live in it is important to make sure that the laws and regulations are being followed by the citizens. The law servants, popularly known as a police force look after the society and take preventive measures to ensure harmony and peace in society. Some measures may be extreme which are often required to maintain the balance in society. In my opinion, police force carrying a gun around is not only okay but necessary too due to the two reasons.
Firstly, as a police force, they are highly susceptible to being encountered by criminals hence, carrying a gun could really benefit a police officer. Police force face criminals almost at every step of their day. Some criminals whom they face may be heavily armed and can do serious damage to the police, without a gun it is almost impossible to save yourself from these kinds of unexpected dangerous situation.
Secondly, police force does not carry guns only for the sake of their own security but also for the protection of common people around them. Police force is professionally trained and are perfectly qualified to carry a gun around. Carrying a gun around doesn’t imply that it promotes violence of any kind. As mentioned above, you never know when danger could strike.
Further, it’s not the police force carrying guns that encourages violence; it is people with no relative use of the gun carrying them around like a handbag who promote violence. These people pose a threat to lives of the people around them. One could get into an argument and try to harm people around him/her, under such severe circumstances the police force has to take drastic measures to ensure the security of the people. Not having the required ammunition could lead to some undesirable results.
To sum up, for facing sudden dangers and criminals the police force needs to be ready and armed to protect them. Carrying a gun around doesn’t ensure total protection but it surely gives a lot more scope of protection.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... never know when danger could strike. Further, it's not the police force ...
^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
... These people pose a threat to lives of the people around them. One could get into an argument and try...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, may, really, second, secondly, so, as to, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91788856305 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58111499322 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533724340176 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7545845349 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6470588235 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203041334694 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712058456291 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375535085717 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115915268418 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368510100415 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.