As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.
Since the beginning of time, we have been focusing on solving the enigmas of nature. We have done a commendable job in decoding various phenomena of nature. From the discovery of atom to the discovery nuclear weapons, from fossils to robots, from philosophy to science humankind has done an incredible work. All these discoveries have contributed to the expansion of the horizons of our knowledge about the functioning of the universe. The statement implies that acquiring more knowledge about things can cloud our understanding of things, which is wrong due to the following reasons.
Firstly, “A little knowledge is a dangerous thing”. Knowing a little is more dangerous than knowing nothing at all. For instance consider the trivial example of conducting a science experiment. If the person carrying out the experiment has limited knowledge about the chemicals being used in the experiment, he could do harm beyond his knowledge. Incomplete knowledge can lead to some unfamiliar results and has consequences which may be dangerous.
Secondly, the scientists work hard to attain deep knowledge of the concepts of various sciences for better understanding of the concepts which enables them to conduct new experiments to uncover new possibilities. Refer to String Theory a knotty concept of physics. Scientists all around the globe have been working to gather all the knowledge they can in order to uncomplicate and conceal the ideas of the concept. More knowledge of the concept would surely make it comprehensible.
Lastly, if we look around us we see numerous species of flora and fauna. Biologists have acquired knowledge of the various characteristics of each species which has lead to a better understanding of edible and harmful species. Deeper knowledge of the inner workings of the plants and animals has made them more useful to us. Better knowledge of the biology of the species has revealed new likelihood.
In conclusion, acquiring more knowledge doesn’t only help us get a hold of the concept but also opens doors to advanced possibilities. Keeping in mind the consequences of half knowledge one should always go deeper in order to understand the concept better.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, look, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 350.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29714285714 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03332376466 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4363935791 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165890083566 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545323601567 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679788711726 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958068392233 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183867682271 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.