Some people believe that it is essential to include Physical Education classes in the curriculum for all school-age children. Others think that children's time is better spent on more academic subjects.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It has recently been a topic of extensive debate whether formal education should enlist physical education in the required school courses for all stages up to high school. While the general sedentary theme of contemporary lifestyle plausibly justifies those calls, there are several rebuttal questions to be answered before a rational decision can be made.
Opponents of the proposed physical classes tend to emphasize today's inflation in the qualifications of formal education, which were once more than sufficient to have a firm position in the labor market. Nowadays, however, in order to stand out in the increasingly competitive job milieu, a prospective employee would have to catch up with a conundrum of extracurricular courses, continuous education topics, and practical training. Therefore, state education should favorably implement those extra scopes, since they hold the best for students' future.
On the other hand, proponents of sports courses have a more critical take on the issue. They argue that the current industrial boom, and the competition arising therefrom, is but unsustainable. Not only is it damaging for the limited resources of the environment, as witnessed by climate change and pollution, but it is also affecting man's health by promoting a lack of physical activity. Unless an active intervention is made to mitigate the effects of those trends, it would end up disastrously.
As for schooling, in particular, supporters of compulsory physical education classes highlight their health benefit to young kids, especially with the accumulating evidence on the link between low physical activity and risk of cancer. Furthermore, they reason that such classes would unveil a lot of hidden talents. Given the current high dropout rate among secondary students, this is particularly relevant, because it would allow those children to discover a bunch of alternative opportunities. Even more, in perhaps a decisive resolution to the false dichotomy, recent studies have shown correlations between phyical activity and the very academic achievement, which, if true, might paves the way for a consensus on the relative advantage of undertaking physical education classes.
All in all, although a hasty view of the current job environment would probably favor a change for a more industry-focused curriculum, a more holistic approach to the question of educational systems would necessitate the inclusion of physical education. Personally, I think that, despite the lack of direct transient outcomes, it would be an inevitable step to correct the course of the current global development on the long term.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, as for, i think, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2236.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 404.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53465346535 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10261391674 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621287128713 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.7787974727 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.066666667 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9333333333 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186027177921 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543047145723 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485776902806 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097160170618 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312320903191 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.