Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Although a growing of people feel that scientific investigation ought to share among people, it is argued by some that these information are more worthwhile to share with others. I personally agree with the former opinion.
On the one hand, a group of people, including me, put forward three main arguments to support the idea that access to the results obtained from scientific experimentation should be free. For one thing, open access publications and data enable researches to carry out collaborative research on a global scale which would lead to dispreading new ideas more rapidly and widely so that act as a motivation for new research studies. Furthermore, open access brings benefit on many different levels. For instance, in medicine, doctors can stay up-to-date with the latest medical information to make the best decision for their patients. Another profit of this policy is that new and functional information in various fields would be available to those people who can not afford the subscription to an expensive journal.
On the other hand, others set out to key reasons why scientific research should not be shared easily. According to these people, the scientists not only would take a long time to accomplish a research in their specialized field but also it put the financial burden on them. That is why it is more valuable than being easily accessible to the public. In addition, it is commonly believed that the increasing access to research articles via the internet is caused some people stealing other’s idea which is called plagiarism. In other words, they use of the copy-and-paste function and taking someone else’s word in order to publish in high-impact journals while researchers make additional effort to produce desired result.
By way of conclusion, I can understand why people might disagree to share the results of scientific experimentation to other people, but it seems to me that open access content would increases people’s knowledge and, consequently improves the quality of life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...among people, it is argued by some that these information are more worthwhile to share with other...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 471, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...thermore, open access brings benefit on many different levels. For instance, in medicine, doct...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...ly would take a long time to accomplish a research in their specialized field but also it ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 184, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...ms to me that open access content would increases people's knowledge and, consequent...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, for one thing, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24770642202 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98349351077 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587155963303 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.885242348 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221331022193 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759983815377 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694063416075 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142606283111 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541267549075 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.