Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In the contemporary world, accompanied by the proliferation of technology, there is much information in terms of scientific research, educational knowledge, and commerce, leading to the divergence of opinion on the sharing such ones. While a number of people believe that some data is too important to be shared freely, I am inclined to the view that it should be had access for some beneficial purposes.
On the one hand, there is a limitation in accessing academic information to some extent. Firstly, in the owner or author’s perspective, they may be reluctant of sharing freely their scientific research to the undefined audience. It is explained that scientists may possibly spend their whole life for an academic achievement and they should be rewarded for their efforts and dedication. If they are paid, they are likely to have more motivation and financial support for further research. Furthermore, it is irrefutable that having access to free sources of academic knowledge in all aspects of life could create motives for evil people to do unethical actions or plagiarize. For example, abusing of the shared important knowledge, a number of people may manipulate information to the public or produce fake products to make profits due to the belief in general.
On the other hand, my view is that it is necessary to share as much as possible important information in all aspects of life globally for some desirable results. First and foremost, in terms of healthcare, approaching to various academic knowledge and accomplishment advocates medical experts in the improvement of treatment. A good illustration for that is the medical method and techniques for some dental diseases in North America or Europe is applied for African people may reduce the remarkable rate of mortality there. Secondly, the public of information about international trade and mergers are one of the important factors to enhance the quality of produced goods and open several job opportunities. As a result, it has a positive influence on economic growth and the progress of integration globally. Last but not least, acquiring experiences from accessible educational programs in the developed countries brings advantages in teaching methods in the developing ones. For example, if children in Vietnam have chances to study in a modest and improved curriculum from the UK, they may have a tendency to absorb knowledge effectively and broaden their mind.
In conclusion, for the aforementioned discussion, it appears to me that sharing knowledge, albeit having some disadvantages, has several merits in healthcare, economic and educational fields. In addition, choosing carefully which information to share is also the responsibility of every person to limit harmful actions from outside.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'may', 'possibly'.
Suggestion: may; possibly
...dience. It is explained that scientists may possibly spend their whole life for an academic ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'may'.
Suggestion: may
...dience. It is explained that scientists may possibly spend their whole life for an academic ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in general, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2351.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 436.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39220183486 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14717930952 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525229357798 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 762.3 506.74238477 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.9719804127 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.294117647 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6470588235 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.47058823529 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318873099626 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988764416073 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964499504823 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217573620196 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116917510229 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.