Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punish

Essay topics:

Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.

Punishment for crime is an important thing in a society, because every crime usually harm people or people's belongings. However there is an issue in giving punishment for crimes. Some people agree that fixed punishment must be placed for every crime without considering background of reasons of the crime. Somehow, there is an contradiction to this opinion, that each punishment has to consider the motive of each person. This essay will discuss both of view and outline my outlook.

In one hand, fixed punishment gives an easy work for law department to establish the penalty for criminals. Also, it will reduce fraud in processing the result of law process. This is because there is no consideration from external things, constitution is only one item in considering a punishment to a person.

In other hand, sameness does not always bring justice. a motive must be considered in setting up a rule, for instance there are two cases of stealing a chicken. First case, a thief steals chicken to buy alcohol, the second one the thief steals a chicken to feed his family that do not eat for 3 days. The motive must be considered, because a law needs to contain education to bring a better life for people. If both of case are placed in the same level so, in the next time, people will focus in stealing chicken not the purpose of the law. But, if we make difference between those cases, for example the first situation receive worse penalty than first one, because the motive behind the crime does not worth to steal chicken. But the second one has the deeper meaning. Although we still cannot say that stealing chicken is right, we can see many view from the last case such as a poverty, of a certain country. Therefore, there is another thing that government needs to do hard, because it must protect its people from crime and poverty and gives them a justice by law.

Overall I personally believe that a country must placed a law under a justice, and considering a motive behind a crime is more fair than does not take it into account.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ally harm people or peoples belongings. However there is an issue in giving punishment ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...reasons of the crime. Somehow, there is an contradiction to this opinion, that eac...
^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...sameness does not always bring justice. a motive must be considered in setting up...
^
Line 5, column 844, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun view seems to be countable; consider using: 'many views'.
Suggestion: many views
...t stealing chicken is right, we can see many view from the last case such as a poverty, o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aw. Overall I personally believe that a country must placed a law under a just...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, still, therefore, another thing, as to, for example, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6991643454 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52226220441 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515320334262 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4522657273 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7222222222 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290972036739 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975433277727 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920766805134 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186609564799 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107617067285 0.056905535591 189% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.