Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is a widespread agreement that different offenders have to be imposed particular penalties while some others show a contrast idea that offering punishments also requires considering many factors related to specific cases. Both viewpoints have its own advantages and my partial support would be expanded on the latter.
First of all, people who undermined the others or even the social by any activities have to be strictly punished by the enforced laws. In each countries, the legislators imposed the official regulations of penalties after a long time of taking into account with many personnel and government. Fixed punishments for each type of crime set underlying platform for further investigation and decision, also create equality for people, including criminals and victims. In addition, judges would find it more straightforward in offering any penalties legally if there were specific rules.
On the other hand, it is undoubtedly necessary to put consideration case-by-case before any final undertakings. The investigators also take responsibilities to find out the individual offender's background which might comprises of their circumstances, reasons and motivations to implement the illegal activities. Furthermore, their health should be count on during punishment offering progress. For instance, the crime with psychological problems or any consciousness-related syndromes should receive lighter sentence than the ordinary one. By any way, equality is the most critical criteria that have to be put on the highest priority in enforcing laws.
Having manifest through aforementioned ideas, both views provide the complementary roles in deciding on the punishment. However, government had better do their utmost in further investigation of personal cases to impose the most reasonable penalties.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[2]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun personnel seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much personnel', 'a good deal of personnel'.
Suggestion: much personnel; a good deal of personnel
...a long time of taking into account with many personnel and government. Fixed punishments for e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 218, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...vidual offenders background which might comprises of their circumstances, reasons and motiva...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 349, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'counted'?
Suggestion: counted
...es. Furthermore, their health should be count on during punishment offering progress....
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85393258427 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34688152727 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651685393258 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5815389399 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.230769231 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239937802411 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724633453817 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642505459504 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123978338855 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671810103716 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.