Some people believe that traveling is a valuable experience; others say it is a waste of time and money. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have different views on traveling abroad. While some think that it is money and time consuming action. I side with who believe that being abroad can bring numerous benefits to travelers.
On the one hand, there are some disadvantages of traveling. Firstly, in our contemporary word time is valuable asset, therefore, traveling can be time consuming. In other words, nowadays individuals work hard toward their goals, as a result, they sometimes fail to devote time to their loved ones, thus, a trip to another country can take away precious time. Moreover, in most historical countries the cost of tourist attractions` tickets, food and accommodations are comparatively higher, hence, an immense amount of money is obligatory. In addition, everyone is eager to make money on tourists. For example, the residents of some countries like Spain, Italy are investing money to restaurants, shops and hotels in order to earn money from tourism.
On the flip side, overseas trips can be beneficial. First of all, it will help to learn and study another language and culture faster. Natural exposure to another culture can accelerate the process of learning a new language. For instance, those who want to take IELTS are going abroad in order to learn it faster. Besides, international journeys are usually made by those who are willing to spend their money and time on relaxation. Therefore, traveling can be real adventure, also, it can serve as a good rest. Undoubtedly, a properly organized active and good rest will allow people to work with pleasure and maximum efficiency afterwards.
In conclusion, despite above cited drawbacks of international tourism, I think that visiting foreign country can be quite beneficial due to various advantages like mastering new language better and faster, likewise good rest is one of the benefits of traveling.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
... and time consuming action. I side with who believe that being abroad can bring num...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, hence, if, likewise, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24832214765 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91108881492 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60067114094 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.6678833935 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5294117647 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4705882353 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159954073249 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556559102578 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552740448538 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102123838388 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810678578863 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.