Some people say that relationships should be based on honesty and trust Others believe that it is sometimes necessary to be dishonest in order to maintain harmony Which approach do you consider to be better in relationships and why

Essay topics:

Some people say that relationships should be based on honesty and trust. Others believe that it is sometimes necessary to be dishonest in order to maintain harmony.

Which approach do you consider to be better in relationships and why?

Different people have divergent opinions about relationships. Some people believe that we should be honest and trustworthy while others argue that it is acceptable to lie in limit in order to maintain peaceful relations. In my opinion, I reckon that we must be truthful and loyal in this matter because it aids in building a strong bond and fabricated evidence can be misleading.

Loyalty and truthfulness help to build a stronger and durable relation. In other words, to make mutual understanding healthier, we must speak the truth with partners. For instance, if one has a tendency to tell every single detail without making any deviation, he will remain infallible in maintaining a harmonious relationship. Even if the situation is critical, telling the factual information can give another chance to improve oneself. This will provide an incentive to remain trustworthy and builds up the bond between partners.

Dishonesty could be dangerous in the future because fabricated lies can be identified one day no matter how meticulously one contrives. One liar might give a person another temptation to distort the truth and as a result, there would be a number of liars that could give their companion a sense of distrust no matter how naive he or she could be. This leads to an increased questionnaire among two people and eventually identification of facts. As a result, mutual trust breaks, and relation falls apart.

In conclusion, despite the dissonant view among a number of people regarding harmonious relations, I agree with telling truth because loyalty is the key to peaceful relationships and dishonesty can have a catastrophic impact in the end if it is applied more frequently.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, while, for instance, i reckon, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18545454545 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04479830107 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596363636364 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2886829757 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.692307692 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216172580218 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669838910407 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696486150452 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124307830263 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734816545581 0.056905535591 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.