Some people think that big companies should provide sports and social facilities for the local community. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There has been heated controversy on whether big corporations should install sports centers or social facilities for neighborhoods. Although many argued that companies can directly benefit communities, I am quite certain that only the companies would benefit from this, and this should be the government’s duty.
First of all, making major companies take on such responsibility would be equivalent to making a sponsorship deal. While it is true that local sports facilities promote good health and social centers provide cultural attractions which enrich citizens’ lives, big companies could easily view them as advertisement opportunities. If given the role, they would exploit those facilities to promote their brand (imagine your playground looking like a shoe store like Nike). Moreover, those corporations could charge money to use them, as their simple goal is to earn profit.
Second of all, some organizations may not approve of the idea, as it would distract them from their targeted customers and main products. For example, it would be unreasonable for a huge software company like Microsoft to build an exercise area for the elderly, because they majorly produce computer parts. Therefore, the government should be the one who invests financial resources in building these city add-ons, because the facilities can be ad-free, aimed solely towards the communities’ well-being. Local businesses could be taxed, while maintenance fees could be paid by authorities.
At the end of the day, the government is responsible for building local recreational facilities, not the companies. Personally, it is better for the authorities to provide recreational facilities as businesses would use them mainly for self-promotion.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62595419847 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12531800142 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63358778626 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.905584461 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.833333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225822762939 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817220431338 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674750960128 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141661584578 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028501109852 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.