Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people.
Do you agree or disagree?
For decades, the gap between rich and poor has never ceased to draw public attention. This leads to the fact that it is a responsibility among the rich to help the poor, who face daily hurdles. From my perspective, I completely agree with this.
The main reason that the rich should give priority to help the poor is that they are commonly those who have the financial capability, which makes monetary aid becomes manageable. Taking schooling as an example, such billionaires as Bill Gate could invest his budget in both public and private school for facilities such as tables, chairs, books or even provide scholarships. This example indicates that these necessities could help students, who confront the deficiency of schooling to not only have access to education but also approach promising careers.
Alongside the influence of the rich in the education system, I believe that this responsibility should also be considered when it comes to housing. The main reason is that people these days, especially immigrants, usually confront the shortage of housing and tend to live in low-quality residential areas or even slums. This could lead to various problems related to the spread of harmful disease or a decline in their living standards. However, the rich could approach a project, which helps these people no longer struggle with their current circumstances. Taking Chinese architects as an example, who have collaborated with Cambodian authorities for years to build more private houses and dormitories. Consequently, the residents could afford to these places as they are reasonably priced and experience a more decent life.
In conclusion, although the difference between rich and poor has been obvious for hundreds of years, I think that it is more important if the rich could lend a hand to ones, who are living in difficult conditions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: OBVIOUS_FOR[1]
Message: The adjective obvious is normally used with 'to': 'obvious to hundreds'.
Suggestion: obvious to hundreds
...fference between rich and poor has been obvious for hundreds of years, I think that it is more impor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21404682274 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85645358388 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578595317726 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8018649231 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.923076923 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11537784608 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424983439207 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362576444024 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0772788578862 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018241552882 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.