Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Developed countries tend to give financial assistance to poorer countries but it is not effective to solve poverty. However, others say that other types of support are more important. From my perspective, I completely agree with this and also believe education and infrastructure should be taken into consideration rather than monetary aid.
The main reasons that wealthy countries should give priority to the education system is that this allows people to have access to decent schooling, which may not be well-organized in poorer countries. Besides, most jobs these days require people to possess a certificate or diploma so that they could find a well-paid job. Taking the US as an example, where well-qualified teachers and professionals have been sent to Venezuela in recent years to help local children to learn such fundamental subjects as mathematics and science. This example indicates that this not only helps them to be well-educated but also lays a foundation for later careers.
Alongside the influence of the education system, I believe that the development of infrastructure should also be considered, especially when it comes to the transport system. Most people in poor countries usually face deficiencies of vehicles used for transporting people and goods. This is the case because private vehicles such as cars or motorbikes are costly. However, a railway system developed by wealth countries could be an ideal way to deal with this problem. For instance, a new subway has been recently introduced in Vietnam in association with Japan, which helps local people find it easier to travel and affordable tickets.
In conclusion, although financial support is prevalent among developed countries to help poorer ones, I think that the mentioned options above could have long-lasting effects.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, so, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42049469965 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01236697305 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604240282686 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.999793587 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248076415337 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923609891627 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108489326406 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173726741412 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108573515013 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.