In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
The hungry in poor countries is the one important issue that people and governments was faced with, in recent decades. A significant group of people try to find a solution for this global problem, but they are not successful on the way. In the following paragraphs, I would discuss about the main reasons and give some ideas to solve the problem.
At first, lack of natural resources is the most important cause of hungry among some people. For example, the European countries, had so many green farmlands for producing different kind of foods, vegetables, and meets. On the other hand, African countries has just deserts with no benefit. The second reason is their governments. The governments must decrease the tax rate for poor people and create some industries and companies to make money, job, and food for weakness population. On balance, wealthy people should create or follow relevant charities. Although, they must pay tax more than common people. It is a good idea that governments increase the annual gross dumestic products and try to export handcraft goods to reach countries to emprove the economy in the society.
By and large, there was no other option expect control the yearly rise of population by cultural programs in all aspects. increasing people without any useful plan is another reason to developing the universal hungry. The last formula that I can point to is human beings' lifestyle have to change and the people must help to each others to solve this wordwilde phenomenon.
To put in a nutshell, I pen down saying that governments must try to improve the economy level in their society by fairtrade taxes, constructing companies, and people must to enjoy to charities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 556, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ld create or follow relevant charities. Although, they must pay tax more than common peo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Increasing
...on by cultural programs in all aspects. increasing people without any useful plan is anoth...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...st formula that I can point to is human beings lifestyle have to change and the people...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 168, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...xes, constructing companies, and people must to enjoy to charities.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, as to, for example, kind of, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00706713781 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64504568077 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618374558304 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3815473473 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119786933209 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366824024066 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455039580192 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0768177380633 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510243543764 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.