Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.
Nowadays advertisement play a significant role in marketing and usually people are mostly impressed and buy their goods according to what they seen not due to life demand. There are different attitude about this fact agreement and disagreement outlook that they may think rightly. But I realize that whenever advertising has positive effect in social life but negative its own influence is more.
Advertisement has been since many years ago but probably after innovated of TV advertising was also burn in a new shape which today all advertisements in different media are affected by TV program. This program lead people to consumerism and fancy thing is bolded for nation. A huge amount of money has been moved and in fact advertisement has been made as a business. In this world people with different level of life has been living and more of them couldn’t pass their life need. Life expenditure is so high and fancy living has been advertised more and more. Manufacture try to gain the marketing and this competition make advertisement more important than past was. Competitive marketing cause that people is made mistake. They are buying goods not due to their need but according to thing that they think is true. Therefore consumerism has been growing in nature.
In other word advertisement may be a good and needfulness thing for this world. Today people are normally busy and they don’t have enough time to spend on looking for everything they want. Advertising could help them to find different level of a thing and make an easier way to select the appropriate life goods. In addition with advertisement companies have to produce better and cheaper things and in fact a competitive production has been formed among manufacturer that has a great benefit for clients.
Generally we can say that everything will have good and bad effect on social if it isn’t being controlled. There are advantage and disadvantage of advertisement that worst of them is expanding of consumerism and best of them is being cheaper and more quality of production.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 101, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'burned', 'burnt'.
Suggestion: burned; burnt
...er innovated of TV advertising was also burn in a new shape which today all advertis...
^^^^
Line 2, column 825, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...rding to thing that they think is true. Therefore consumerism has been growing in nature....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help them find' instead.
Suggestion: help them find
...everything they want. Advertising could help them to find different level of a thing and make an ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...o select the appropriate life goods. In addition with advertisement companies have to pr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cheaper and more quality of production.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, therefore, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04970760234 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90531030134 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529239766082 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8559036059 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9444444444 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38888888889 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175410730973 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576562920317 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490629761276 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106780620326 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376616450011 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.