In today’s job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future job applicants may not need any formal qualifications. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

In today’s job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future job applicants may not need any formal qualifications. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Generally, doing some specific tasks has always required some related expertise during the progressing of humans’ life. This situation has formed in different ways with the passage of time. It is a fact that the presence of technology and modern knowledge will be affecting humans’ lifestyle, in particular the future career which is an undeniable situation. The interaction of humans and technology has constantly been a controversial issue that makes governments and ordinary people to be concerned.

To some extent, there is an undeniable discussion about the alteration in the area of job market for the sake of technology and meta computers. Today, if there is a need to find a new method or information about some occupations, the Internet makes the way easy to do research on that. Indeed, it brings about distance working for individuals. Apparently, the humans’ natural needs may alter in the future to consume can food or some pills of food to satisfy their needs that machinery era elaborate it. Therefore, the requirement of qualified individuals will be lessen by the computerized society in which everything will be run automatically. Although the occurrence of this kind of society is indisputable, another viewpoint mentions that the humans’ communities always require experts and qualified people for their survival.

Obviously, through modern ages, perhaps, the need for formal skills or expertise will be still exist in small areas. Both practical and theoretical skills and knowledge are necessities for the progress of humans’ civilizations and all humans’ finding owe trial and error methods to catch their results and it translates that countries need experts to handle meta computers with their skills in the future.

To sum up all the above statements, I have to say that there will be no optimistic view of removing knowledge and practical skills from humans’ life, so the more human civilizations grow and also the more time pass, the more qualified people will be needed.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 513, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts and ordinary people to be concerned. To some extent, there is an undeniabl...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lified people for their survival. Obviously, through modern ages, perhaps,...
^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s with their skills in the future. To sum up all the above statements, I ha...
^^^
Line 13, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e more qualified people will be needed.
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, if, may, so, still, therefore, as for, in particular, kind of, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39563862928 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08902029289 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557632398754 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2380005142 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.230769231 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165894280188 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541389956184 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446913559329 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102631282609 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328915777597 0.056905535591 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.