Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In every society and modernized ones, making friends and relationship have always been among primary concerns of human beings' lives. Today, it is axiomatic that people spend the longer part of their life working and they have not enough time to concentrate on their relationships. A plethora of people possess the conviction that it is better to keep the old relationships with few persons for long times, whereas others might hold exactly the opposite view. I firmly endorse the former conviction rather than the latter one. In what follows, I am going to aptly delve into the most outstanding reasons to advocate my point of view.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that according to the improvement of all aspects of lives, activities and humans' concerns is going to escalate. Therefore, the people cannot pay enough attention to choose suitable friends. Also, because of complicated situations which everybody is involving with them, understanding the true face of other people is too sophisticated. In my own experience, lacking of recognition of others' personalities leaded to find the wrong person for making relationship in both genders. Since, I did not spend sufficient time on choosing them.
Another equally noteworthy point supporting this opinion is that two person who have made an old relationship with each other can understand themselves more than the new ones. In the other words, in this kind of friendship both sides have used to being together and they are aware of their behaviors is many situations. For instance, the old friends likely know that what reactions do you have about some happenings. Had not they known, they would not have handled their partner's behavior in terrible events.
To put it in briefly, all the enumerated reasons lead us to this issue that not only is maintaining and keeping the old relationships with few friends more beneficial than making the new friends, but also it can preserve the people from the distractive behaviors of the new person. However, a paramount issue that must be mentioned is that this cannot be used as a prescription for everybody and some counter examples might exist, which are not mentioned above. As a result, I suggest some statistical studies and researches to find the more exact answer for this topic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... complicated situations which everybody is involving with them, understanding the true face ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...or making relationship in both genders. Since, I did not spend sufficient time on cho...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, in brief, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1055408971 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79749581451 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55672823219 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4582549473 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.823529412 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2941176471 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183069983181 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537592907825 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486157327407 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112330023583 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302118027944 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.