The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society.
Do you think the advantages outweigh the advantages?
It is clear that the use of technology in order to socialize is overcoming human real interaction. This essay will explain that the benefits of internet such as the increase in the connectivity are stronger than the drawbacks of possessing less feelings between people.
The cutting edge technology has allowed individuals to stayed connected with a plethora of people on a daily basis. This is because with the use of social media such as facebook or instagram, everyone is able to communicate with all of its friends at the same time. Therefore, with only a touch of a button you can chat with any of your contacts and thus have more relationships than real interaction can make. To illustrate this, research research has proven that nowadays young people that use technology for socializing have 70% more friends than in former times.
The foremost disadvantage of curbing the face to face communication is the lack of empathy. Technology has disminish the ability of the people to be aware of the other person real feelings. As a result, real relationships become more superficial and are shorter than before. For example, a survey done last year in the University of Mendoza founded that in modern times a half of relationships last no longer than 2 years.
In my opinion I believe the benefits of internet such as facebook and skype outweight the possible detriment in real humans relationships, due to the fact that this kind of software has lead to excellent communication skills than ever before that allows people to have more friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun feelings is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ronger than the drawbacks of possessing less feelings between people. The cuttin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: research
...teraction can make. To illustrate this, research research has proven that nowadays young people t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, therefore, thus, for example, kind of, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98846153846 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89288813734 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565384615385 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2610908793 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.909090909 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117717242472 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486456397494 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469747175534 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0627553760392 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323477774138 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.