Volunteer work organised by middle schools brings more benefits than problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Volunteer work has been promoted in many schools and has even been listed as one of the requirements for graduation. Although voluntary work has some downsides, I would like to argue that it is of great value to both the participants and the whole community.
First of all, students can develop positive qualities by taking part in community services. They will be confronted with many problems and challenges while doing community works, which are rarely seen at school. For example, to raise funds for charity organizations, they have to learn about how to communicate with benefactors, how to organize activities, and how to cooperate with others. These experiences will boost their confidence and improve their problem-solving skills.
At the same time, the younger generation can gain a sense of responsibility and acquire an understanding of how to contribute to the community from community work. They will acquire a sense of community because they know their work can make a positive difference for those needy members in society. For instance, by assisting children from poor homes in the study, middle school students can feel that helping others receive education can make a fairer and happier society, which is beneficial for us to build a close-knit community.
However, we cannot rule out the possibility that sometimes community services can turn out to be a wasteful use of volunteers’ energy and time if they are not carefully planned. Voluntary work can be dull and hectic, rather than a rewarding experience with educational value. As a consequence, participants would not be willing to devote their time as they cannot see the value of their work. Or, they may think that volunteer work takes away their study time and interferes with their study. But if we think it another way, students can learn to manage their time because of their tight schedule.
All in all, my view is that volunteer work is of great significance for students’ skills and job prospects, as well as the social progress, provided that schools can make sure that the work satisfies students’ needs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18023255814 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96579449608 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546511627907 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9156714956 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.8 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104305443048 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403615337019 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337238049159 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681329777543 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265386840062 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.