All parents want the best opportunities for their children. There are some people who think that schools should teach children skills but others think having a range of subject is better for a children’s future.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Although the common goal is the children’s bright future in the long run, many people argues that soft skills should be learnt at school while others claim that the broad variety of scientific and human knowledge is more beneficial for kids at a young age. This essay mostly agrees with the former statement as it can be seen in the next paragraphs.
Soft skills are utterly important for a successful life. If we compare the wealthiest people from around the world, we will find out that their common point is not their vast lexical knowledge but their ability to handle other people and their strong belief in themselves. A lot of underpaid employee, who stuck as a clerk for decades for example, would have surely been promoted to leading positions if they had learnt how to be confident and convincing. Undoubtedly, there are fortunate children who were born with these skills but they are in minority. School would be the ideal place to pass on these techniques since parents sometimes also lack these abilities hence they cannot teach it to their kids.
On the other hand, lexical knowledge is also a key factor to be considered as educated. As it is often said, an intelligent person is someone who knows something about everything. However, it would be sufficient if these subjects were taught at a later stage in secondary school. It would be easier to learn long poems by heart if the technique of learning, which also a crucial soft skill, was learnt first.
In conclusion, both skills and subjects have their places in children’s education but their order can make a difference.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to long'
Suggestion: to long
...ary school. It would be easier to learn long poems by heart if the technique of lear...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87545787546 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64099769841 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604395604396 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5294610516 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.916666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24796054513 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853056803917 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684100663854 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161202800773 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730140277153 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.