Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are better prepared to deal with the problems of adult life than children brought up by wealthy parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Environment, nowadays plays a crucial role in the holistic development of a child. Although, money plays a significant role in children children's growth, some opine that the children who nurture in the shed of money are less capable to face problems while they will reach at the age of adults as compared to those children who are brought up by unwealthy parents, I strongly adhere with the school of thoughts and will justify my stance in upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, wealthy parents make their children mentally handicapped. Owing to large money, children put no efforts to full fill their desires such as owing a new car and getting a job. Naturally, they just use the wealth of their parents to achieve their goals. Hence, they become lazy. On the contrary side, the guardians, who do not have enough money, taught their children how to complete their dreams with hard work. A survey conducted by Cambridge University revealed that the children, who were born in poor families are more successful and mentally strong as compare to those, whose parents already had enough money.
In addition to this, a lot of money has adverse consequences on the growth of children. If parents provide a high amount of pocket money to their children, then they will use this money to do parties and also they will never understand the value of money until they don no face some trouble such as loss in business. Therefore, some adults commit suicide when they face trouble in their future randomly. While the situation is totally opposite for these children who's parents do not give them money to squander on parties. They are habitual to these circumstances. Consequently, they able to understand the value of wealth.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that adults who nurture in poor families not only they are active in nature, but also able to tackle the difficult situation when coming in their path. Hence, in my opinion, adults who are brought up by those families who had not enough money are more successful in their life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 464, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
... is totally opposite for these children whos parents do not give them money to squan...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, then, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90434782609 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54075786639 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.0073296472 49.4020404114 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.75 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297647002757 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916809220973 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876024202413 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187948460594 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376641599447 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.