Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say this information may be relevant and useful others disagree
Discuss both views and give opinion.
The recruitment process plays a pivotal role in order to run an organization smoothly.
Beside the information mentioned in the resume, it is essential to know about private information. Some people fervent the conviction that it is relevant while others think that it is futile to contribute time for these questions. This essay will discuss both views in detail with my favoured opinion.
Todays in the dynamic and competitive corporate sectors it is quintessential to develop the relationship of employer and employee. It is pragmatically possible to generate the background idea about foreseen working conditions of interviewees. Personal Information sometimes have a profound impact on the results of the interview. For instance, the marital status confirms the upcoming hurdles that might take place, perhaps more leaves requirement for fulfilling other responsibilities. Sometimes hobbies and interests accentuate people's skills like coordination, cooperation, teamwork and patience. Also, the employer inculcate the attitude of interviewee and remark them according to criteria based on getting personal information. So it would not be preposterous to ask about personal attitude
Conversely, a person's capabilities cannot be judged on the basis of mere personal information, the most critical quality us to possess technical knowledge about the required area. Some job seekers do not like to discuss about themselves that does not pronounce their inefficiency. Therefore, it would be insane to acquire confidential knowledge rather than understanding of their practical exposure in industry.
Eventually, it is beneficial to know about a person's attitude even if it does not contribute a lot to the company. This essay discussed both sides and I believe, to know your employee far better it is necessary to have some background knowledge of him along with academic and practical experience.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 46, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ually, it is beneficial to know about a persons attitude even if it does not contribute...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, so, therefore, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7027972028 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24021565733 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5385576729 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.733333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2656281274 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717857248954 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478617797615 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118230739874 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820709832011 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.