Governments give a lot of support to artists, even though some people think it is a waste of money that could have been used elsewhere.
People working on art related jobs receive huge amount of financial support from governments. While some would argue that this funding is necessary, I believe states should spend their supporting for people with disabilities.
On the one hand, supporting artists is essential because they cannot afford their living fees to continue their jobs, especially in the starting time. Artists salaries are depended on amount of audiences. Even though arts are important factors in human life, not everybody can understand and enjoy them. Therefore, people do not usually choose to purchase tickets which are normally in high prices in order to watch arts related shows. For example, Natalie, a famous ballet dancer, said that without funding from the government she might not have enough money to follow her passion. However, I believe that artists should not get a lot of financial support from governments because at least they have ability to earn money by themselves.
On the other hand, instead of supporting for artists, governments should spend their funds for disable people, who do not have enough health to work regularly. Handicapped people, having mental or physical disadvantage, hardly find a job that be able to afford their lives. They do not have a lot of opportunities as same as healthy persons. Thus, their life would be more comfortable if they could receive state’s supports. For instance, Vietnam government spend millions of dollars for people who was born with disabilities because of the chemical war’s affection. Without this, they cannot survive because they cannot find jobs with their disadvantages. I believe this spending is preferable because it brings to the disabled an easier life and ensures that they are happier and healthier.
In conclusion, although spending funds to artists helps them afford their life to continue their jobs, governments should support more for disable people because they do not have normal health conditions to earn enough money for their expenses.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35109717868 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66751819949 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0319486282 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.6875 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178511523059 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629868966597 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459777135106 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123479099963 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252860742449 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.