Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Infrastructure is one of the most important as well as basic aspect for the growth of any nation. In the same context, a group of people advice establishment to spend more money on railways rather then roads as they think former are more comfortable, while the other group of people oppose this and want more funds to be spend on latter as roads provide better connectivity.
Admittedly, metros are the cheapest mode to commute whenever a person is travelling within the city or out of state. Further more, with the technological advancements, they are not only safer but also reduce the travelling time. For an instance, In China, 70% of people travel by Bullet train as it is always on time and help them to reach their desired locations on time. Even the less, they do not pollute the environment, hence should be promoted in order to keep our proximity clean.
Indeed, Railways are fastest mode, but they are not available in the remote areas or indirectly, they cannot connect all the parts of any nation. At that time, roads fulfil the purpose. Construction of roads is much easier and they do not require hefty amount. Apart from that, people can travel at any time with the means of their personal vehicles. Hence, they are very purposefulness during the emergency period.
Having dwelled on such thoughts, It can be convicted that both, railways and roads, are very useful and authorities should spend money on dual modes so that equilibrium is maintained and both are accessible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
... to spend more money on railways rather then roads as they think former are more com...
^^^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the fastest'.
Suggestion: are the fastest
...ur proximity clean. Indeed, Railways are fastest mode, but they are not available in the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, then, well, while, apart from, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87843137255 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66991152061 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607843137255 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1777805079 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123459112096 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394000406276 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313547816817 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759401550728 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229286854487 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.