It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaur, dodos ...) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
In the contemporary world, opinions are divided whether human should interfere with the natural procedures to save animals from extinction or not. While there are some reasons to support the view that people should not take actions, I believe that preserving animals is of fundamental importance.
On the one hand, it is comprehensible why some people denounce the protection of faunas against extinction. Firstly, the natural process is intertwined with the progression of the evolution of all species. Specifically, natural selection plays a role in preserving the most adaptable and developed species and eradicating inferiors , which leads to the development of the world and creates an advanced society. Therefore, when exerting themselves to put a halt to this process, people are coercing themselves to live in a primitive and uncivilized society. Secondly, there will not be adequate basic needs for all species to coexist harmoniously. For instance, if carnivore dinosaurs were resurrected in the 21st century 21st century, they woulinvade people's territory and feed on humans for their daily food due to the paucity of edible d feed on humans due to the shortage of edible sources in the contemporary era.
On the other hand, I believe that the responsibility for preventing animals from disappearance should devolve on human-beings. To begin with, the diversity of animals plays a pivotal role in maintaining the existence of all species and humans are human race is not an exception. For example, in a food chain, when a small organism such as frog is exterminated, correlative consumers of this animal like snakes, hawks and even humans would experience a dearth of food, leading to the extinction of these species. Another reason worthy of consideration is that were it not for the natural preservation, humans’ technological advances related to in this field would not be innovated. to figure out the enduring solution for to ecological problems. Particularly, there are now some state-of-the-art machines that are able to purify the atmosphere and restore the pristine habitats of endangered species including rhinos and pandas. This can be counted as an enduring solution to the present ecological problems.
In conclusion, though there are some benefits of shirking the responsibility to protect fauna species, it is not to say that preventing natural process from taking place does not have any redeeming features.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ral selection plays a role in preserving the most adaptable and developed species...
^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eloped species and eradicating inferiors , which leads to the development of the w...
^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itive and uncivilized society. Secondly, there will not be adequate basic needs f...
^^
Line 5, column 687, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...o in this field would not be innovated. to figure out the enduring solution for to...
^^
Line 5, column 956, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hinos and pandas. This can be counted as an enduring solution to the present eco...
^^
Line 5, column 978, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... can be counted as an enduring solution to the present ecological problems. In ...
^^
Line 6, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e does not have any redeeming features.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2064.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38903394256 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14767812906 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543080939948 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9698579594 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9375 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269775515391 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821700991997 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402292814775 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158655030887 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354176454048 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.