It was predicted that people in the 21 century would have much more free time than in the past. To what extent has this prediction come true?
There was a prediction that modern citizens would have more free time in comparison with previous epochs. In this essay, I will consider if this expectation became our reality.
I assume that the prediction was quite precise because, with the appearance of technological advances, humanity has become freer from domestic chores and has more spare time for the other activities. For instance, our ancestors spend a lot of time doing laundry, cleaning a house, while modern people have washing machines, vacuum cleaners, and other appliances. Thus, today these items save our time significantly and domestic work has become more energy-efficient and less time-consuming. In addition, machines save a person’s time not only at home but at work as well. They do a great deal in the industry, agriculture, or a modern office, replacing energy and time-consuming operation by faster machine operation and procedures.
In addition, improvements in the transportation system and infrastructure allowed people to travel in the blink of an eye. To illustrate, in the past a journey from one country to another could take months. Meanwhile, with the appearance of aviation even more remote areas can be reached for a couple of days. Thus, modern transport saves a bunch of time and let people travel around the world and have quality time. Previously, the idea to visit Paris or another foreign city on the weekend could be recognized as ridiculous, today it is quite feasible and appropriate.
In conclusion, I think that it was predicted accurately enough that individuals of the 21st century would have more spare time than it was in the past. This is because the invention of modern technologies and advances in transport hugely saves time and let the public use it for the creative process and other activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 734, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aster machine operation and procedures. In addition, improvements in the transpo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 572, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y it is quite feasible and appropriate. In conclusion, I think that it was predi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, well, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18027210884 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00978128396 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574829931973 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1165428765 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.785714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298454532034 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102507921552 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112836219016 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211964156146 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931524899604 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.