In many countries, it is now illegal to smoke in public places. It is only fair that people who wish to smoke should have to leave the building. Do you agree or disagree?
Smoking publically is legally banned in most parts of the world. Awareness against the harmful effects of smoking has led to strict rules, where one may have to leave the premises in order to smoke a cigarette. I strongly agree that smoking is injurious to health, and people accustomed to such habits should only smoke in restricted smoking areas, for the safety of others health.
Firstly, smoking adversely affects one's health. It damages internal organs and can even lead to terminal illness such as cancer. Although smoking cigarettes is a personal choice, one involuntarily harms others around them. For instance, smoke produced from a lit cigar or a cigarette is equally harmful to those who inhale it even though they do not wish to smoke.
Secondly, the peculiar odor from the burning tobacco contaminates the air and makes breathing difficult for others around a smoker. Chain smokers often expose their children and other family members by choosing to smoke at home or in public areas. For example, youth often follows in the footstep of their parents and tend to take up smoking eventually.
Lastly, public awareness campaigns are successfully run to bring to the notice the ill-effects of smoking to individuals and their immediate surroundings. Various 'Quit Smoking' campaigns have been launched by popular brands as goodwill advertising. Helplines and rehab centers are set up to assist break smoking addiction. Substituted such as tobacco chewing-gums and electric cigarettes are made available to smokers to resist smoking.
In conclusion, I support the decision of prohibiting cigarette-smoking publically, as it poses danger to health and the environment. Violation of rules issued in the interest of the public safety should be taken very seriously. The government must levy high taxes on such harmful products. Commercial ads of cigarettes are banned in many countries and other such commodities should be largely discouraged.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
.... Firstly, smoking adversely affects ones health. It damages internal organs and ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...available to smokers to resist smoking. In conclusion, I support the decision of...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36038961039 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88733129149 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4887580179 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7222222222 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286922659542 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853972673799 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673589702446 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157117335513 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835692003154 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.