Many historical sites and museums are mainly visited by tourists, not local people.
Why is this the case?
What can be done to attract local people to visit these historical sites and museums?
The main visitors of a heritage site or a museum are always the tourists and seldom a local resident. In this essay, reasons for this phenomenon will be analyzed and relevant solutions to encourage locals for such visits will be provided as well.
It is obvious that historical sites are often considered boring and time consuming places. Specifically, the galleries filled with old insignificant pieces of art and history. The people residing in its vicinity are very well aware of the associated facts and myths. As a result, they avoid going to these places. Another factor to consider is a walk in a museum takes up a lot of time. Generally, local residents see tourism as a source of income. So they are not concerned about visiting same place again and again. Rather they would cater to the need of tourists so that they could earn some money.
On the basis of the above reasoning, comprehensive solutions have been identified. The first solution is reinforcing the rule to allow free entry for locals to visit these places. For instance, at Sun Temple, Modhera the ticket for entering is costly for foreigners however, a nominal rate is charged for Indians. This has drastically increased the visitors in a past few years. The next solution is educating the general public. To be more specific, it is time for government to generate awareness among people to know their own heritage places. The community should promote the significance of their cultural sites. Apparently, these measures will significantly promulgate the importance of such places.
In conclusion, various reasons have given rise to a fewer visits to museums and historical sites. Nevertheless, I firmly believe that steps such as mandating a small entry fee and raising awareness in regards to the importance of these sites must be taken to tackle the worrisome situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 518, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...ut visiting same place again and again. Rather they would cater to the need of tourist...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ars. The next solution is educating the general public. To be more specific, it is time for go...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 198, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...a small entry fee and raising awareness in regards to the importance of these sites must be t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03908794788 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7866292451 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596091205212 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.493432192 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.35 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.35 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276459046227 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689372221956 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070534529862 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175366892942 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707294657218 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.36 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.