Many historical sites and museums are mainly visited by tourists, not local people. Why is this the case? What can be done to attract local people to visit historical sites and museums?
Archaeological sites stand as a witness to the human civilization symbolizing the cultural heritages and their historical significance towards the society, thus a section of society deems that majority of historic places as well as archives are mostly explored by globetrotters rather than commoners. This impels me to deliberately scrutinize the reasons behind this trend as well as practical measures that the government can implement in order to insist natives to visit such places.
To commence with, there are several reasons why such sites are primarily visited by tourists instead of locals. First and foremost, local people often grow up seeing and experiencing these historical landmarks, leading to a sense of familiarity that can make them less likely to visit. This further allows them to take these specific areas for granted, assuming they can tour it anytime. Apart from this, in this competitive era, most of the commoners are occupied with their daily routines, work and family responsibilities, ultimately leaving them with limited leisure time. Furthermore, ticket prices may be a deterrent for local visitors. This financial barrier can discourage regular visits by locals, who may prioritize other spending needs.
However, increasing awareness through educational campaigns can highlight the importance and value of local history and cultural heritage which can be done through various mediums such as schools, community events and so on. Not only this, making museums more accessible and relevant to the local community can help mitigate this issue. To substantiate it further, by organizing special exhibitions, workshops will not only cater to the interests and needs of local residents but also if authorities collaborate with local historians, can also create engaging and inclusive experiences. Moreover, offering discounted and free admissions to local residents, particularly for certain days can also encourage participation.
To recapitulate, I aver that fostering a sense of pride and connection to local heritage, combined with targeted efforts to engage the community, can help attract more natives to historical sites as well as museums
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, apart from, as for, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63829787234 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01124238089 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641337386018 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.0878919883 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.692307692 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373756315369 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117098166778 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572800869858 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203519312767 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392589436784 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.