Many people believe that media coverage of celebrities is having a negative effect on children.
To what extent do you agree?
Media is a pillar which can change an individual’s life. It is a belief among many people who gave a lot of attention to celebrities is creating a destructive influence on children. I completely agree with the statement. There are various factors which represent the effect of the same.
The primary reason for the destruction is children are very innocent and do not have much reasoning to do. They copy their surroundings which include their parents, their sibling, and teachers and to whatever they look around. The media coverage of the celebrities with their influential lifestyle and to whatever activity they do, kids try to duplicate the same thinking it can give attention to them also. The second reason is that fame and recognition among the mass will become important for them and it can lead them to move in the wrong direction and become demanding. Damage done to a child is difficult to overcome and they are in an age of development.
However, there can be few reasons to counterfeit the effect that it can give direction to the children to choose their career which has recognition and attention. They can also take the positive from their social works.
To close, the negative effect overrules the justification. The children can become adamant and attention seeker and if not given so, can lead a volatile or vulnerable behaviour. Various measures should be taken to limit the penetration of the media into a celebrity’s life and telecasting the same.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... thinking it can give attention to them also. The second reason is that fame and rec...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00806451613 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93724468636 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6834625226 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7142857143 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 7.06120827912 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18122487888 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642672522398 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551496238786 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112962716314 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484364137069 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.