Many people work long hours, leaving very little time for leisure activities.
Does this situation has more advantages or more disadvantages?
Omnipresent, everyone wants to raise family members who happy and successful. Many people spend most of the time their job that why very few times give to others. This will essay will discuss the reasons both positive and negative in detail, why someone works for their family whereas others emphasize more leisure time.
On the one hand, nowadays majority person busy career and business. In present, money is the key factor in the atmosphere because everybody desires to be keen on a family member is well. For instance, always all are wanted their children going to better school and family going to overseas tour. So, for good lifestyle need the money and wealth-related work or business. Also, someone contemplates that wore is virtue what is not only own but also other. For example, doctors are a great job who are work much more time since treatment to people. Thus, social activities better than passing leisure.
On the other hand, leisure activities are part of life. Family and friend always want to spend with time unless there are unhappy beside impact to work. Time management needs to properly, if another, going to reverse impact everywhere. For example, many teenage drugs attracted one of the top reason parents not given time. Finally, day by day many ones going to less capable one of cease not properly activities for own.
In conclusion, this essay discussed some advantage properly maintain life for money and work for society and disadvantage family and friends are disappointed not passing leisure activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pointed not passing leisure activities.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06692913386 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46445686655 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61811023622 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3642596858 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4375 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.875 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277789224067 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801368624334 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690384303069 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173978168248 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386154076152 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.