More and more people in developing countries are purchasing cars for the first time. What problems does this cause > What do you think are the possible solutions ?
It is observed that an increasing number of residents from developing nations are procuring private means of transport, such as cars. This essay will discuss pollution as a significant problem of a large number of private vehicles and will deduce that a reliable solution is improving standards of public transport.
One major problem of this development is pollution. Globalization has improved the economy of countries worldwide, and it now plausible for people to buy cars which were once luxury commodities. The increased number of vehicles has caused the air to be contaminated with toxic pollutants, as a result of which the global carbon footprint has surged. Another factor cars contribute to is noise pollution. Cumulatively, both these forms of pollution has made it difficult for people to live healthy lives. For example, Delhi declared a health emergency after the polluted smog infected people's respiratory system, and consequently, many people were reported to have had convulsions.
One possible and viable solution to the issue at hand, is enhancing public transport facilities. People are buying cars because it is affordable, comfortable and convenient. If public transport were to improve its standards then people would not be as dependent on cars, thereby reducing the overall emissions. A greater number of routes and better travelling conditions would facilitate increased usage of it. For instance, people in Mumbai prefer travelling by the metro train instead of driving their cars because it is air-conditioned, fast and easily accessible.
In conclusion, while possessing cars can make it convenient for citizens of developing countries, improvised public transport systems would be a sanguine development at the aid of countries subject to intense pollution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s pollution as a significant problem of a large number of private vehicles and will deduce that a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...countries subject to intense pollution.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58759124088 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08660965226 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609489051095 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8625263497 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.357142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182695679694 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643849654458 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375895307438 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106953085743 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334616204705 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.