More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering,computing and medicine.Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world.
Do you agree or disagree?
Undoubtedly, exceptionally talented individuals are migrating to effluent nations to be designated at profund positions. Beside the fact few people claims that this a preplanned strategy of developed countries to entice young aspirants from underprivileged regions whereas majority of society vocalize that it is a natural phenomenon. However, this essay depicts concern in the support of lateral viewpoint as aspiration of better lifestyle and meager infrastructal facilities are accountable for such trend.
Since, with the evolution of mankind it is purely evident from the past experiences that human psychology always drive denizens towards never ending progess. Therefore, in the search of greener pasture educated generation prefer more organised places to channelize their energy for some constructive purpose. Moreover, desire of international exposure in order to broaden the mental horizons for self-sufficency is one of the main factor behind such behaviour. For instance, as per the research conducted by International immigration council states that around 25% of professionals of India has shifted in Canada, America and Australiafor permanent bases attributable to the profound ameneties in every sector.
Even though underdeveloped geographical boundries are depriving for their human assets due to this practice, undeniabley authorities are directly responsible for this hassel. Reason to this is that government is not repaying to the talented workforce for their valuable services which ultimately provoke them to look for better opportunities. Fourtunately, rich countries are bestowing job seekers with adequate salary structures and ample chances for self-recognisation which is the prerequisite to lead a successful life. It would be biased to overlook the data published by Queen University of London explains that due to the ill wage policies of the administration of North Corea, dwellers are moving to more prominet euoropean nations.
To conclude, although this emerging trend is associated with some critical prejudices, it is going to surge briskly in upcoming future. Hence, the world is in the state of flux because nature is bound to change and can not be restricted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ties are accountable for such trend. Since, with the evolution of mankind it is pu...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...f mankind it is purely evident from the past experiences that human psychology always drive deni...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stowing job seekers with adequate salary structures and ample chances for self-re...
^^
Line 5, column 699, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inistration of North Corea, dwellers are moving to more prominet euoropean nation...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, whereas, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77370030581 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25060773325 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663608562691 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.0588995382 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.230769231 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102918271949 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310191307622 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369520431344 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.053462028288 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271085044758 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.64 8.58950901804 136% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 78.4519038076 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.