Most employers do job interviews before offering a position to a person. Do you think this is the best way to do it, or are there better alternatives? What is the best method of choosing employees in your opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Hiring the right candidate is utmost important step of any company. Many firms believe that job interview is a systematic way to get a potential employee onboard. In my opinion, in an ever changing environment , sticking to one method is not advisable as different positions require various skill set that needs to be tested. This essay will discuss the advantages of a personal interview round along with a possible best method including relevant examples to support my points.
On the one hand, there is ample evidence that many firms for leadership positions, emphasize in conducting multiple rounds of interviews before offering the role. The central reason for this is, it gives the employers an opportunity to gauge the candidate in a better way. A personal interaction will allow the interviewers to study the body language and assess his performance when put under pressure. To illustrate this, an Oxford University research suggests that 60% of Fortune 500 organizations hire basing on how well they maneuver in interviews. Therefore it is conclusively clear that it is one of the best and widely used methods around.
Although there is a case for personal interaction assessment being effective, the necessity for the co-existence of other methods cannot be understated. Not all job levels need the same skill set. Different roles in organization seek different abilities. For example, a programmer who develops code cannot be gauged on his interpersonal skills alone as the core competency is coding and deploying of a program. Thus it is possible to state the recruitment process has to be dynamic in accordance with the open position with weightage being given appropriately to each step.
In conclusion, despite discussion with the candidate is a popular method across the globe due to its completeness, in my opinion for different roles, it has to be coupled with different assessment techniques for better results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...opinion, in an ever changing environment , sticking to one method is not advisable...
^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...n how well they maneuver in interviews. Therefore it is conclusively clear that it is one...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...y is coding and deploying of a program. Thus it is possible to state the recruitment...
^^^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sessment techniques for better results.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26129032258 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01850662134 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609677419355 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8314633781 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.733333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199125351615 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643765342806 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04983668615 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120696302786 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547682266793 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.