Most societies have homeless people. Some people think that the best way to help them is to give them money.
To what extent do you agree?
There are numerous societies in the world having people without shelter or food to eat. It is argued that providing them with hard cash is an ideal course of action. However, I have a full disagreement with the above viewpoint, because it has a negative impact on the working habits of such underprivileged people and it is also threatening to the socio-economic growth of any country.
On one hand, giving away money to homeless people out of concern will spoil their habits, fortunately. To explain this, if people like these start getting money without any effort or skill, as a result, they won’t be able to understand the value of having it. Moreover, rather than working or getting a job, they will rely on begging and living unofficially on footpaths. It is a popular belief that what you earn easily is not worth it. For instance, most developing countries are suffering from widespread begging on streets and as an outcome, few of them enforced a ban on such activity.
On the other hand, this thinking of people to give away money to homeless people for free has devastating effects on socio-economic growth for any nation around the globe. In addition, these inhabitants having thought of getting financial help for free rather than earning it directly affects the societal standards of any economy. Furthermore, it has a direct relation to the social progress index (SPI), which is the backbone of any nation in terms of social well being and quality of life.
To sum up, giving money to a needy could be a social cause. But all citizens must respect governmental laws and guidelines before taking any step out of such concern. The main reason for doing so is to help the nation in growing socially and this is the best option available to help these poor individuals to respect and earn money in a lawful manner.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 334, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a lawful manner" with adverb for "lawful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...r individuals to respect and earn money in a lawful manner.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, in addition, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83544303797 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6934600065 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569620253165 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3116027535 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.142857143 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228439406386 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708653843722 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459761414704 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125793306764 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223021469499 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.