nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians. What are the reasons for this. Is it a positive or negative development
Undoubtedly, many evidences prove more earning of the celebrities than the politicians. While some people are still of negative view. I will discuss both advantages and disadvantages with the country's development.
There are a plethora of reasons for famous personalities earning and devoting more money than the leaders. The visibility of audience has increased globally, more and more events are being taking place world-wide. Many rich companies are coming forward for hiring a professionals like sport men, actor etc, for advertisement. Before launching a new product, a famous personality do promotion, in return chunk of money is earned and some proportion is contributed in the form of taxes to the government for country's development, whereas the money earned by a leader is not taxable under the law. To sustain in future, the Hot star offer much of the money as donation for a noble cause while the political party devote money to only show their personal objective.
Moreover, famous people earn money for their fame and personalities but leaders get most of their e by corruption mode and illegal means only. If the actor's have more money, they will use it for a noble cause but the politicians will only show their power and interfere in country's decision-making. Many sincere leaders, due to shortage of money get forced to move towards dishonest means of earning income.
In hindsight, famous personality earnings are more favorable than the political person. They can improve the economic development of our country but authority only forces a dedicated person with short of money to either quit or move toward illegal means of earning money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...f the celebrities than the politicians. While some people are still of negative view....
^^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isement. Before launching a new product, a famous personality do promotion, in re...
^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...s not taxable under the law. To sustain in future, the Hot star offer much of the money a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20817843866 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89046784856 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583643122677 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1593710354 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.769230769 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316962515889 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119256006856 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769232708061 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190096620009 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383907688579 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.