Nowadays people prefer to shop, work and communicate on the internet.
Is this a positive or negative development?
In many parts of the world, the internet has taken over the lives of people by storm. I believe it to be a positive development not only because of its mega-advantages related to saving time and earning a hefty amount of money but also because of its primary usage as a cheap communication. This essay will explore how these mega-merits make this development a positive one.
Firstly, the internet saves a lot of time which people usually spend on shopping in traditional brick-and-mortar shops. As e-commerce provides a plateform where everything is available with a click of a button instead of hunting around for desired objects. Take an example of Australia, where a significant proportion of people prefer to do shopping on Amazon.com due to their fast delivery. Thus, the convenience of online shopping makes this development a positive one.
Secondly, in this contemporary world, working on the internet is preferable as it emboldens masses to earn more money as compared to conventional means. Because many companies are offering handsome remunerations to their international employees, the exorbitant number of people are joining the online international workforce. This fact can be better explained with an example of a German company where the majority of the employees are working from Norway. Hence, the internet does have a positive impact on the lives of people.
Finally, the internet allows individuals to connect with others living in far-flung areas at a very low cost. As traditional calls cost people a fortune to connect with their family members, but the online application has made lives much easier. Therefore, the usage of the internet in fact is a positive development.
To sum up, the use of the internet for daily purposes can benefit in terms of providing a fast connection with people, saving time and money, all these mega-advantages make it a positive development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rnet in fact is a positive development. To sum up, the use of the internet for d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23701298701 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09121601663 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542207792208 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0990366741 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.533333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313613637765 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106475738547 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669867620059 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163226585711 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690512545282 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.