People doing dangerous sports activities like scuba diving and bungie jumping, they should be responsible for their own life and rescue workers should not risk their lives to save people. Do you agree or disagree?
In recent times, adventurous and dangerous sports are gaining a lot of popularity. There are various sports which involve a decision of endangering one’s life and at the same time, Lifesavers shall not risk their lives for the safety of the others. According to me, an individual should be held accountable for threatening’s one’s life in spite of a rescuer.
I am on a complete agreement that these adventurous and dangerous sports like scuba diving and bungee jumping involve a life threating event. People take part in such activities thinking that the rescuer will save their life even after knowing the probable consequences of it. According to the research, it is seen that many people meet with an accident with a water animal and the lifesaver lost their life while saving the one.
People are highly influenced by these types of games because these gave them a sense of thrill and satisfaction. But this should not be done at the cost of risking other life. The government can also take various measures or can roll out few policies with the permissible standards which are strictly adhered. Hence, in this way, we can cut the threat to rescuers life.
To summarize, it is acceptable to take part in such games till the time it does not risks the life of both the parties. By taking sensible steps, the hazard nature of these games can be limited. Moreover, the participant can play any game but should help themselves and not calling for support.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...eir lives for the safety of the others. According to me, an individual should be held accountab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 85, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'risk'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: risk
...in such games till the time it does not risks the life of both the parties. By taking...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 85, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'risk'
Suggestion: risk
...in such games till the time it does not risks the life of both the parties. By taking...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1234.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91633466135 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72186499861 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597609561753 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.56967496 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9230769231 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15384615385 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246774970908 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839940559875 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054417499667 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14326082775 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611822332721 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.