In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping. Is this a positive or negative development?
These days large shopping centers and luxury malls are replaced with small and traditional shops. Customers are willing to purchase stuff from big malls as well. Therefore, small shops have closed.
On the one hand, it is a positive development. Firstly, since malls have wide range of goods and various brands, customers could buy everything that they need and compare with other goods. In addition, they can benefit from different promotion which there are launched on a monthly basis. Secondly, large shopping centers are equipped and there have kids section, international restaurants and cafes. Consequently, customer can take full advantage of these places. For example, children can play in kids zone and parents spend some quality time with each other in cafes. Thirdly, mall might lead to reducing traffic because malls provide customers with free parking. Thus, they do not compel to park their cars in the streets.
On another hand, it can be negative development. The main reason is that large shopping centers cause to consumerism. Since large shopping centers are full of different stuffs, costumers are more likely to purchase exceedingly. Consequently, it can encourage the consumerism behavior in the society. Another reason is that when small shops have closed, a vast number of people might become unemployment. Therefore, it can increase the unemployment rate in community. Moreover, from cultural perspective big malls might destroy remained buildings and historical gardens because for building these malls, builder need to destroy old areas in the cities.
In conclusion, from my point of view neighborhoods with small shops are more lively than fancy malls where there are full of customers who buy goods more than they need.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35869565217 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67908997691 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572463768116 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5932924731 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8421052632 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5263157895 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57894736842 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32153851766 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100956647337 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886177133265 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213201653948 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720983901134 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.