Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Although some people thought that children ought to learn foreign language in primary schools, others believe that learning a second language should be in secondary schools. I completely agree, studying foreign language in lower grades is advantageous but having more burden in toddlers is negative to their health.
On the one hand, children who learn second language at primary age are better both in schools and later in life. In other words, offsprings who begin to learn second language at young age are more applicable which make them to work harder than those who start to study in later part of life. Therefore, such students have greater ability to communicate with individuals and which consequently produce better understanding to appreciate this world. Furthermore, being driven to achieve the best is vital in order to become successful which closely relates with the understanding.
On the other hand, It is seen that students who utilise themselves in studies in large proportion are not that much strong. In other ways, infants who give more efforts in studies have higher stress level than those who apply less in learning at early age. In addition to this, their health is more detrimental because they do not have enough time to do fun activities by which they are supposed to have more pleasure. For instance, in recent study at University of Toronto, students who spend more time in studies at the early age are more unhealthiest than those who utilise a small amount of time.
In conclusion, while some people may vary in their opinions, I consider that learning second language at primary schools are supportive for their future life, however care should be taken into account about children health while learning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to second'
Suggestion: to second
... On the one hand, children who learn second language at primary age are better both...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to second'
Suggestion: to second
...er words, offsprings who begin to learn second language at young age are more applicab...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'understanding appreciating'.
Suggestion: understanding appreciating
...s and which consequently produce better understanding to appreciate this world. Furthermore, being driven t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 537, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'unhealthiest' (without 'more') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: unhealthiest
...re time in studies at the early age are more unhealthiest than those who utilise a small amount o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12937062937 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58542023084 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552447552448 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.9038504359 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.363636364 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0909090909 7.06120827912 200% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277217341033 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10655972442 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892986758249 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178448402699 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578425997325 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.