Some people are convinced that mature age employees are beneficial to a company. Others think that younger employees contribute more and hence are more beneficial to a company. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
there is widely held perception in many parts of the world today that old people's contribution to work is much higher than youngers while others argue opposite of that. This essay agrees that younger generation is more innovative and updated compared to old generation and both sides will discuss here.
To begin with, youngsters knowledge is up to date and they could make the company successful by applying their fresh knowledge and capacities. Moreover, their adventurous young minds always take risks and find new opportunities to upgrade working environment whereas old workers often resist to change. On top of that, current generation use information technology to make their work ease. Recent study by University of Jayawardanapura found that companies which employed highest proportion of youngers are more efficient than places occupied by old workforce.
On the other hand, some disagrees with the above idea and they argue that workforce with more experience have developed expertise in a particular field which help in solving problems with the past experience. Infact, there is no doubt that everyone seek advice from adults in critical conditions and same applies to companies even. For instance, in research institutes, research fellow is always observing all research activities of research officers as they have gained vast knowledge in particular field.
However, people who have passed their prime, might not be able to commit to work properly since their productivity is going down with age. With the advancement of years, their ability to perform goes downhill, whilst, young workers are still energetic to perform well in their career.
In conclusion, while the expert knowledge that workers had gathered through their working experience is beneficial to a workplace, still fresh knowledge is much more advantageous regarding company's prospects. Hence, younger people should be more welcomed to workforce than keeping experienced staff. Because,benefits that brings to the by youth is far outweigh the old worker's expert knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
there is widely held perception in many parts...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... many parts of the world today that old peoples contribution to work is much higher tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...which help in solving problems with the past experience. Infact, there is no doubt that everyon...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 301, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rkforce than keeping experienced staff. Because,benefits that brings to the by youth is...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 308, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , benefits
... than keeping experienced staff. Because,benefits that brings to the by youth is far outw...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, moreover, regarding, so, still, well, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, no doubt, to begin with, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52050473186 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81443176893 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615141955836 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7619422927 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6428571429 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118279307934 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405631448613 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443458549112 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693952082734 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471500469921 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.